Posted by Jacob J. Nelson on April 16, 2012 
Wrong, BNSF 4722 was involved in the wreck with the BNSF 4663. Not sure what happened to the BNSF 1123, must have happened recently. On RRPA, there is a pic of the BNSF 1123 on the rails as recent as Jan 2012
Posted by Bill Caywood on April 16, 2012 
Was 1123 operable and running when photographed ? I do not see the yellow plastic tape and or Do Not Enter signs normally placed on damaged equipment. Since the damage is above the nose ( cab front and top ) it is possible to run this unit back to a repair shop as a trailing engine. This type of damage could have been from a shifted load if it was a trailing unit, or from a falling tree if it was a leading unit, rather odd damage. On closer examination the left step well handrails may be yellow taped.
Posted by Lester Zmudzinski on April 16, 2012 
With all the noise from the movement in the yard and wind gusts due to oncoming thunderstorms, I could not discern whether 1123 was running. I checked another view and exhaust ripples were noticeable from the other two units. This is a "going away" shot technically.
Posted by Jake McGarvie on April 16, 2012 
If 1123 was a leading unit and I was the conductor I would have resigned on the spot. That unit took a hard lick from something. That's why they are called safety cabs.
Posted by TheSPModeler on April 17, 2012 
I know its in the background but where is the B unit for the rotary plow? They have a GP behind it.
- Post a Comment -