| Posted by David Honan on September 7, 2010 | |
Awesome capture, Tom! Both Conrail and D&H had jet-powered snowblowers, where the exhaust from a turbine was directed onto the tracks to melt snow. I experienced one of Conrail's machines in action at Voorheesville when I was a kid and it was LOUD.
|
| Posted by Paul Rose on September 8, 2010 | |
The advent of concrete ties would solve the burning tie & creosote problem, but today's fuel
costs would likely preclude getting much use out of one these days....
|
| Posted by David North on September 8, 2010 | |
Boy that looks fun! I also heard of GG1s being cut in half and using thier redirected hot air vents to heat switches, albiet not being quite as exiting as this.
|
| Posted by Ron Chouinard on September 8, 2010 | |
New Haven Railroad used their weed burner for snow melting. Caused a stir one Sunday night when everybody was calling the Valley Falls Fire Department reporting the yard was on fire.
|
| Posted by Greg Poston on September 8, 2010 | |
If this is a turbine powered snow blower/switch defroster, yes other railroads use them. But for that to be physically shooting out that much of a flame, I think something must be drastically wrong with the turbine. You would only get flames if you were dumping out unburned fuel. I am wondering whether this piece of equipment is actually turbine powered or if Conrail was just using a home-made flame thrower here though.
|
| Posted by Erick Anderson on September 8, 2010 | |
Homemade flamethrower is what this looks like. There doesn't appear to be more to it than a control cab (?), fuel tank and plumbing, with nothing turbine-looking at all. That would also explain the smell of fuel, since a flamethrower doesn't burn its fuel as thoroughly as a turbine.
|
| Posted by ChevelleSSguy on September 14, 2010 | |
Hot dogs and marshmallows anyone?
|
| Posted by alex swain on September 14, 2010 | |
Thats a neat find.
|