Posted by David Honan on September 7, 2010 
Awesome capture, Tom! Both Conrail and D&H had jet-powered snowblowers, where the exhaust from a turbine was directed onto the tracks to melt snow. I experienced one of Conrail's machines in action at Voorheesville when I was a kid and it was LOUD.
Posted by Paul Rose on September 8, 2010 
The advent of concrete ties would solve the burning tie & creosote problem, but today's fuel costs would likely preclude getting much use out of one these days....
Posted by David North on September 8, 2010 
Boy that looks fun! I also heard of GG1s being cut in half and using thier redirected hot air vents to heat switches, albiet not being quite as exiting as this.
Posted by Ron Chouinard on September 8, 2010 
New Haven Railroad used their weed burner for snow melting. Caused a stir one Sunday night when everybody was calling the Valley Falls Fire Department reporting the yard was on fire.
Posted by Greg Poston on September 8, 2010 
If this is a turbine powered snow blower/switch defroster, yes other railroads use them. But for that to be physically shooting out that much of a flame, I think something must be drastically wrong with the turbine. You would only get flames if you were dumping out unburned fuel. I am wondering whether this piece of equipment is actually turbine powered or if Conrail was just using a home-made flame thrower here though.
Posted by Erick Anderson on September 8, 2010 
Homemade flamethrower is what this looks like. There doesn't appear to be more to it than a control cab (?), fuel tank and plumbing, with nothing turbine-looking at all. That would also explain the smell of fuel, since a flamethrower doesn't burn its fuel as thoroughly as a turbine.
Posted by ChevelleSSguy on September 14, 2010 
Hot dogs and marshmallows anyone?
Posted by alex swain on September 14, 2010 
Thats a neat find.
- Post a Comment -