| Posted by Barry Byington Sr. on March 4, 2009 | |
Now THAT is a mood shot...soooo many things can be described in vivid detail with few words. This is nice work, Mike; I hope it gets a ton of views.
|
| Posted by David Wheeler on March 5, 2009 | |
Whoops. Love this unique shot PCA from me
|
| Posted by Ron Tilley on March 5, 2009 | |
That could put a damper on operations!
|
| Posted by Janusz Mrozek on March 5, 2009 | |
Terrific shot!
|
| Posted by Mark Rosnick on March 5, 2009 | |
Very creative Mike. Nice shot
|
| Posted by Steve Carter on March 5, 2009 | |
Nice perspective Mike. Your right, it does sort of minimalize the problems they have at the moment.
|
| Posted by on March 5, 2009 | |
A really good shot, Mike. Glad to see you made top shot of the day, this photo definitely deserved it!
|
| Posted by Mont Panichjeerasin on March 7, 2009 | |
Absolute perspective! You did it again man.
|
| Posted by Patrick Smith (Railwolf) on March 10, 2009 | |
I know it's probably not what happened here, but I like how the rear of the train is out of focus, as if continuing on, not noticing that something is missing. The rust on the bar almost makes the metal look red-hot. Very nice photography!
|
| Posted by David Nutter on March 17, 2009 | |
Fantastic shot!
|
| Posted by Mike Massee on March 17, 2009 | |
Excellent photo. The perfect example of extreme foreground interest well framed with everything else.
|
| Posted by Paul Springowski on September 12, 2009 | |
So that's how a spare coupler would look on my HO layout!
|
| Posted by Conrail Fan on April 6, 2010 | |
I think they forgot something.
|
| Posted by Bruce Brown on July 14, 2011 | |
Looks like the key fell out where the drawhead attached to the car body underframe. Being a retired RR man, I've seen this more than once. I'd venture to say that it was unavoidable, so don't blame the poor engineer. LOL.
|