| Posted by Nick Hart on October 17, 2007 | |
Excellent shot Andrew. Oh yea, the train was nice too.
|
| Posted by W. D. Shaw on October 17, 2007 | |
Ditto that!
|
| Posted by Mitch Goldman on October 17, 2007 | |
Leaves you wanting to see more...
I like it, despite cutting the engine off.
Number 40 looks like a completely different engine as composed in this photo.
Thanks for yet another double-take.
|
| Posted by Dennis A. Livesey on October 18, 2007 | |
Reminds me of the "Rail Girl" shots in Railroad Magazine back in the '70's. Thanks for the memories!
Dennis A Livesey
|
| Posted by on October 31, 2007 | |
The only thing better would be if the girls name was, I don't know, Ellen Cole, or something. You know, Ellen C. Sreiously, nice shot, Andrew. You always find something a little different.
|
| Posted by Joe Fusco on January 28, 2008 | |
Hot stuff, Andrew. Haha. This shot is also a great example, that, althought #40 is a relatively small locomotive, it is still very large when compared to a human being.
|
| Posted by FSWood on November 16, 2010 | |
Trains ain't just for boys! My wife Kathy is a railfan and modeler. Our middle granddaughter has potential that way, too, being a huge Thomas fan.
I'm kind of the mind that no matter the person's identity, it is what makes the photo work. Not sure how to pin words on that idea, though.
|
| Posted by bnsfwarbonnet on July 20, 2013 | |
You have to do the hand signal to get him to toot the whistle.
|
|